C2 or C6? CP for certain.

[Tripper]

I keep going back into this listing like, "Wait, now do you look cool? Ew, oh no. Maybe this angle...no."

[trivet]

It's interesting for sure, but it just screams "kit car" to me. A very well done kit, but still.....

[Shop-Teacher]

@tripper Ugh! There are so many of these weird conversions. Honestly, this is probably the best looking of all the "back-dated" modern Vettes that I've seen, but still no. Modern roof lines just do not work with classic styling.

[Vondon302]

@tripper 86,000? Just no.
I

[HFV]

@tripper it looks cool when you can’t see how the front and back aren’t as low as the side skirts. That’s wear it gets awkward.

[Tripper]

@vondon302 Yeah...for an automatic frumpymobile

[phenotyp]

86 grand, and reserve not yet met? Holy CP.

[RacinBob]

With 600 hp pushing that C2 body through the air, I bet the front end would feel mighty light at top speed......

[Eury]

There was one of these where I used to live. It just looks wrong from most angles.

[Highlander]

@tripper I would buy that just to burn it to the ground.

[Milky]

@tripper L O fucking L at that price. You can get the real thing for cheaper.

[Chariotoflove]

@tripper No. Just no. At any price.

[TexturedSoyProtein]

I don't quite hate it as much as I know I should hate it, but the big thing that ruins it for me are the bumpers don't reach nearly as far down to the ground as the side sills.

[Italia]

@tripper that's gonna be a no from me dawg.

[Tripper]

@highlander I'll bring the gas

[just-a-scratch]

Someone placed a bid of $87,000 for that. I assure you, it was not me.

[ranwhenparked]

@tripper it's not quite as terrible as these things usually are, but that still doesn't mean it's good. To use CNN's terminology, sure, its bad, but is it "25th Amendment bad"?

At a significant discount over an equivalent unmodified car, it would be acceptable, at a price vastly higher than the better looking genuine article, crack pipe.

[fintail]

Luckiest generation with money, unstoppable.